The first 0.0.17 cut (run 687) failed verify-pins in CI for two reasons. The asset generator embedded admin/dist/.src-hash, a freshness stamp that CI's artifact copy does not carry; it now skips dotfiles. And the Arch zig package emits different code than the ziglang.org tarball that CI installs, so the cut downloads the pinned tarball (ZIG_TARBALL_SHA256 in gates.yml, the full digest keys the cache) and builds the release with it. flake.nix is re-pinned to the bytes both now produce.
The saturated-primary pool test gates its holders on a semaphore instead of sleeps and releases every spawned holder on the way out, so a loaded runner cannot flake it. The package job uploads the payload before the pin check and runs the check when the version or flake.nix changed against the parent. The verify-a-release recipe clones the tag first and builds with the official zig.
Two errors the test build never saw, because the test binary analyses only what the tests reference: `Io.Dir.makePath` does not exist in 0.16.0 (`createDirPath` does), and the tag push passed the optional authorization where the checked token was meant. The test step now depends on the cut compile as well.
flake.nix fetches the release tarballs and carries their SRI hashes in a generated block. The cut tool builds the release locally with the toolchain gates.yml pins, in a normalized nine-variable environment, writes the hashes into flake.nix, and commits it with build.zig.zon as the single bump commit. The package job verifies the pins on the bump commit and the publish job verifies them again on the tag, before anything is uploaded.
The tarballs are written by dist_stage (std.tar.Writer, flate gzip) instead of the runner's tar and gzip, and -ffile-prefix-map keeps checkout paths out of the C objects; two checkouts at different absolute paths produce byte-identical archives. nxdns version, /api/version and the admin footer report the version only: the bump commit cannot know its own sha.
the gate recomputes the previous release tag's ddl fingerprint from the
remote peeled object and compares it against the tree's; a change must
be disclosed by 'resets your query history' in the version's changelog
section. the 0.0.9 reset shipped with an announcement claiming no
schema change; this makes the impact mechanical instead of remembered.
mokhtar