docs: the install guides ran against the published v0.0.21, no more no-release notes

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-19 17:25:39 +02:00
parent f2dd6ad1c7
commit 534c620695
4 changed files with 15 additions and 59 deletions
+7 -33
View File
@@ -6,18 +6,9 @@ The image is multi-architecture — `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64` — so the s
For what each configuration field means, see [the configuration reference](../reference/configuration.md).
> Verification: the failure modes, the run and the two checks in step 3 were run
> on the machine that wrote an earlier revision of this page, against an image
> built from this checkout rather than pulled from the registry — no release is
> published yet, so nothing on this page could be run against a pulled image,
> and step 1 could not be run at all. One command was run in altered form: host
> port 8080 was occupied there, so the run and the verification commands in
> step 3 were executed with the host side of the port mappings moved to 25353
> and 28088 rather than the 53 and 8080 printed below. The container side was
> unchanged. See the note in step 3. The `chown` to uid 65532 needs root and was
> not run.
> Verification: on 2026-10-02, steps 1 to 3 were run against the published `v0.0.21` release with an image pulled anonymously from the registry, on the host ports printed below; the notes in those steps carry the detail. The failure modes in step 2 were run on the machine that wrote an earlier revision of this page, against an image built from this checkout. The `chown` to uid 65532 needs root and was not run.
>
> **Not re-run for the file-mode revision.** The compose file now ships
> **Earlier, for the file-mode revision.** The compose file now ships
> `command: ["run", "--config=/etc/nxdns/config.zon"]`, and no container was
> started against that command on this host: staging a release image needs
> `zig build dist`, which refuses to run while `admin/dist` is stale, and the web
@@ -56,12 +47,7 @@ cut -d@ -f2 IMAGE-DIGEST.txt
The last two have to print the same string — `IMAGE-DIGEST.txt` holds a whole pinned reference, `name:tag@sha256:…`, so the `cut` is what reduces it to the digest `imagetools` prints. [Verify a release](verify-a-release.md) covers the key, the fingerprint, every failure message, and what the signature does and does not prove.
> Not verified on this host: no image and no release are published yet, so
> `docker pull` and every URL here fail today, and the `releases/latest` lookup
> returns 404 and leaves `VERSION` empty. That lookup was run against
> `gitea.com/gitea/tea` on Gitea `1.27.0+dev` and printed `0.15.1`. The
> `docker buildx imagetools inspect --format` shape was run here against
> `alpine:3.22` on Docker Hub and printed that image's index digest.
> Verified on 2026-10-02 against `v0.0.21`, with an empty `DOCKER_CONFIG`, so no registry credentials: the lookup printed `0.0.21`, `docker pull` succeeded without a login, `gpg --verify` printed `Good signature` with the primary fingerprint above, `sha256sum -c` printed `OK` for all three files, and `imagetools inspect` and the `cut` both printed `sha256:ce1fef32c7ee6c23656abd94e53e4d4d6b1d34fe88a2c842b82c7202d8b904c3`.
## 2. Get the compose file and write the configuration
@@ -72,9 +58,7 @@ mkdir -p ~/nxdns && cd ~/nxdns
curl -fLO "$BASE/raw/tag/v$VERSION/deploy/docker/compose.yaml"
```
> Not verified against nxdns: there is no tag yet. The Gitea raw-file URL shape
> `<repo>/raw/tag/<tag>/<path>` was run here against `gitea.com/gitea/tea` on
> Gitea `1.27.0+dev` and returned the file with a 200.
> Verified on 2026-10-02: the `curl` returned `compose.yaml` from the `v0.0.21` tag with a 200.
Compose bind-mounts `deploy/docker/etc-nxdns` read-only at `/etc/nxdns`. Create it and put the configuration in it:
@@ -166,7 +150,7 @@ A healthy first start logs the reconcile, the authority and the bound sockets:
```
info(migrations): config.db migrated from schema version 0 to 1
reconciled '/etc/nxdns/config.zon': upstreams +1 ~0 -0; settings +45 ~0 -0;
reconciled '/etc/nxdns/config.zon': upstreams +1 ~0 -0; settings +46 ~0 -0;
settings keys changed: dns.bind_ipv4 dns.bind_ipv6 dns.port web.bind web.port …
web authentication is now enabled
info(nxdns): authority: file (/etc/nxdns/config.zon)
@@ -183,15 +167,7 @@ dig @127.0.0.1 example.com A +short
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' http://127.0.0.1:8080/
```
> On the machine that wrote this page, host port 8080 was already taken by an
> unrelated process, so the container was verified with the host side of the
> port mappings moved to 25353 and 28088 — everything inside the container was
> unchanged, and the log still reads `serving on udp [::]:53`. Against those
> ports `dig` returned the A records for `example.com` and `curl` returned 200.
> `docker compose up -d` fails with
> `failed to bind host port 0.0.0.0:8080/tcp: address already in use` when a
> host port is occupied; free the port or edit the `ports:` list. The image
> under test was built locally, not pulled: there is nothing published to pull.
> Verified on 2026-10-02 with the pulled `v0.0.21` image, the configuration above and the unchanged `compose.yaml`, on host ports 53 and 8080: the first start logged the lines above, `dig` returned the A records for `example.com`, `curl` returned 200, and `/api/health` reported `"status":"ok"` with one of one upstreams available. `docker compose up -d` fails with `failed to bind host port 0.0.0.0:8080/tcp: address already in use` when a host port is occupied; free the port or edit the `ports:` list.
The compose file publishes 53/udp, 53/tcp and 8080, keeps `/var/lib/nxdns` in the named volume `nxdns-data`, and sets the per-namespace sysctl `net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=0` so uid 65532 can bind port 53 without any capability. Uncomment the 443 and 853 mappings when you enable the DoH or DoT listener; see [Enable DoH and DoT](enable-doh-and-dot.md).
@@ -209,9 +185,7 @@ To pull the arm64 image from an x86_64 machine — to inspect it, or to save and
docker pull --platform linux/arm64 git.mial.net/mokhtar/nxdns:$VERSION
```
> Not verified on this host: nothing is published to pull, and this host is
> x86_64 with no emulation, so an arm64 image could not be started here even
> if it were.
> Verified on 2026-10-02 against `v0.0.21`: `imagetools inspect` lists `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64`, and the pull above fetched an image whose `docker image inspect` reports `linux/arm64`. It was not started: this host is x86_64 with no emulation.
## Build the image from source instead